Respond to prefers-color-scheme dark in app web views

Follow section front redirects in Spectrum

Enable NLP source in PCS for load testing

Switch off the News Alerts Survey Widget when we have enough responses

Poll to determine if new LUF updates are available

Allows the winning A/B test variant to be turned on without Spectrum deployment

Show infinite scrolling sections in Assembler MultiView

Show option for NLP article summaries in Action Bar

Show NLP summaries collection recirc on article pages

A general feature flag for Recipe Features that aren't yet released

Feature flag for media team features that aren't yet released

Use new Orca video player for preroll plugin in Spectrum

Show the snow tracker (instead of the heat tracker) on Spectrum

Biden once nearly died of an aneurysm. Risky surgery changed his life.

Election 2024 latest news: Primary elections today in Maryland, Nebraska, West Virginia

Michael Cohen outlined a crime. Did he prove that Trump committed one?

Man, 91, shocks tiny firehouse with $500K gift: ‘Nobody knew how much I’d saved’

Retired cop meets abandoned baby he helped 23 years ago: ‘What are the odds?’

I used to dismiss my mom’s advice. Then I found a note she wrote before she died.  

Can you spot bad financial advice on TikTok? Take our quiz.

5 myths about Social Security as the program faces a funding crisis

Social Security has to be fixed. But you still need your own savings.

Ask Amy: What if the mysterious mourner at my dad’s memorial is my brother? 

Miss Manners: My relative’s memoir was poorly written and boring

Carolyn Hax: Is it ‘charming’ to stage a surprise wedding at a family reunion?

How the authoritarian Middle East became the capital of Silicon Valley

These four searches show how Google is changing

OpenAI wants users to act natural around ChatGPT

Ted Leonsis remains interested in buying the Nationals

Senator will block RFK site bill unless team honors family of logo creator

Nationals-White Sox rained out; Josiah Gray edges closer to return

Tired of overcrowded national parks? Here’s how to go backcountry camping.

Pete Buttigieg’s view from the middle seat

Airlines are trying to stop Biden from enforcing ‘junk fees’ rule

Woman who punched crocodile to save twin awarded medal by King Charles

Trade pact would be a bonanza for Africa — if it can be made to work

14 dead after massive billboard in Mumbai collapses on gas station

Haiti’s plight is a case study in the ‘responsibility to protect’

No, Apple, people do not want tech to crush everything in its path 

The urgent air defense lessons of April 16 

The wacky, grueling bike race that captivates a Midwest college town

Biodegradable fabric might be the next best thing in clothing

Are home prices still rising? See how prices have changed in your area.

Angela Alsobrooks Wins Maryland Senate Seat 

Where do America's most racist people live? "The rural Northeast and South," suggests <a href="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0122963#pone.0122963.ref001" target="_blank">a new study</a> just published in PLOS ONE.

The paper introduces a novel but makes-tons-of-sense-when-you-think-about-it method for measuring the incidence of racist attitudes: <a href="http://www.google.com/trends/" target="_blank">Google search data</a>. The methodology comes from data scientist Seth Stephens-Davidowitz. He's used it before to measure the effect of racist attitudes on <a href="http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/09/how-racist-are-we-ask-google/" target="_blank">Barack Obama's electoral prospects</a>.

[<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/04/14/data-suggest-republicans-have-a-race-problem/" target="_blank">Data suggest Republicans have a race problem</a>]

"Google data, evidence suggests, are unlikely to suffer from major social censoring," Stephens-Davidowitz wrote <a href="http://static1.squarespace.com/static/51d894bee4b01caf88ccb4f3/t/51d89ab3e4b05a25fc1f39d4/1373149875469/RacialAnimusAndVotingSethStephensDavidowitz.pdf" target="_blank">in a previous paper</a>. "Google searchers are online and likely alone, both of which make it easier to express socially taboo thoughts. Individuals, indeed, note that they are unusually forthcoming with Google." He also notes that the Google measure correlates strongly with other standard measures social science researchers have used to study racist attitudes.

This is important, because racism is a notoriously tricky thing to measure. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/04/14/data-suggest-republicans-have-a-race-problem/" target="_blank">Traditional survey methods don't really work</a> -- if you flat-out ask someone if they're racist, they will simply tell you no. That's partly because most racism in society today <a href="http://med.stanford.edu/diversity/FAQ_REDE.html" target="_blank">operates at the subconscious level</a>, or gets <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/racism-in-canada-finds-fertile-ground-online-1.2833043" target="_blank">vented anonymously online</a>.

For the PLOS ONE paper, researchers looked at searches containing the N-word. People search frequently for it, roughly as often as searches for  "migraine(s)," "economist," "sweater," "Daily Show," and "Lakers." (The authors attempted to control for variants of the N-word not necessarily intended as pejoratives, excluding the "a" version of the word that analysis revealed was often used "in different contexts compared to searches of the term ending in '-er'.")

[<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2014/11/09/the-n-word-an-entrenched-racial-slur-now-more-prevalent-than-ever/" target="_blank">An entrenched racial slur is now more prevalent than ever</a>]

It's also important to note that not all people searching for the N-word are motivated by racism, and that not all racists search for that word, either. But aggregated over several years and several million searches, the data give a pretty good approximation of where a particular type of racist attitude is the strongest.

Interestingly, on the map above the most concentrated cluster of racist searches happened not in the South, but rather along the spine of the Appalachians running from Georgia all the way up to New York and southern Vermont.

[<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/08/25/three-quarters-of-whites-dont-have-any-non-white-friends/" target="_blank">Three quarters of whites don't have any non-white friends</a>]

Other hotbeds of racist searches appear in areas of the Gulf Coast, Michigan's Upper Peninsula, and a large portion of Ohio. But the searches get rarer the further West you go. West of Texas, no region falls into the "much more than average" category. This map follows the general contours of a <a href="http://users.humboldt.edu/mstephens/hate/hate_map.html#" target="_blank">map of racist Tweets</a> made by researchers at Humboldt State University.

So some people are sitting at home by themselves, Googling a bunch of racist stuff. What does it matter? As it turns out, it matters quite a bit. The researchers on the PLOS ONE paper found that racist searches were correlated with higher mortality rates for blacks, even after controlling for a variety of racial and socio-economic variables.

"Results from our study indicate that living in an area characterized by a one standard deviation greater proportion of racist Google searches is associated with an 8.2% increase in the all-cause mortality rate among Blacks," the authors conclude. Now, of course, Google searches aren't directly leading to the deaths of African Americans. But previous research has shown that the prevalence of racist attitudes can contribute to poor health and economic outcomes among black residents.

"Racially motivated experiences of discrimination impact health via diminished socioeconomic attainment and by enforcing patterns in racial residential segregation, geographically isolating large segments of the Black population into worse neighborhood conditions," the authors write, summarizing existing research. "Racial discrimination in employment can also lead to lower income and greater financial strain, which in turn have been linked to worse mental and physical health outcomes."

[<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/08/07/white-people-are-winning-the-war-on-whites/" target="_blank">White people are winning the 'war on whites'</a>]

Cornell University, BA in religious studies

Christopher Ingraham was a reporter on The Post’s business desk from 2014 to 2021. He currently writes <a href="https://thewhyaxis.substack.com">the Why Axis</a>, a newsletter about the data shaping and informing our lives.